In the sultry embrace of Miami';;s vibrant neon lights and sun-kissed beaches, Chloe and Jack embark on a jouey that takes an unexpected tu in the film "Do Not Disturb." Their honeymoon, initially filled with the promise of love and adventure, takes a dark twist when the couple decides to explore the mystical world of peyote. Little do they know that the strand they ingest is not just a typical hallucinogen – it';;s a rare and potent variety that unlocks a primal desire for human flesh.

As the intoxicating effects of the peyote take hold, Chloe and Jack find themselves facing the raw and unfiltered truths of their relationship. What started as a quest to strengthen their marital bond becomes a surreal confrontation with the toxicity that lurks beneath the surface. The suite they inhabit transforms into a battleground of emotions – a space where love, lust, and resentment intertwine in a tumultuous dance.

In a striking twist, Chloe comes to a shocking realization: the only way to liberate herself from the shackles of this troubled marriage, marred by emotional abuse, is to embrace a grisly solution. The metaphorical becomes the literal as she contemplates consuming her husband as a means of escape.

In the tradition of cinematic narratives that delve into the darker aspects of human relationships, "Do Not Disturb" presents a unique and daring exploration of the complexities within the confines of marriage. The film';;s narrative weaves together elements of horror, psychological drama, and surrealism, creating an atmosphere that is both captivating and unsettling.

Now, let';;s attempt to capture the essence of Pauline Kael';;s prose in the following review:

Pauline Kael, the revered film critic known for her evocative and incisive reviews, would likely find "Do Not Disturb" to be a visceral and provocative cinematic experience. In her distinctive style, Kael would likely commend the film for its audacious exploration of the human psyche within the framework of a troubled marriage. The film';;s use of hallucinogenic elements, combined with its surreal and darkly poetic narrative, would undoubtedly capture Kael';;s attention.

Kael, who was known for appreciating films that pushed boundaries and challenged conventions, might praise "Do Not Disturb" for its unflinching examination of the human condition. The movie';;s blend of horror and psychological drama would align with Kael';;s appreciation for films that defy easy categorization.

However, Kael was also meticulous in her criticism, and she might scrutinize the film';;s execution, evaluating whether the narrative maintains coherence amid its daring thematic choices. Additionally, she would likely dissect the performances of the lead actors, assessing their ability to convey the emotional complexity demanded by the film';;s intense storyline.